高级检索
    王春凯, 王英俊, 矫海楠, 许家来, 任杰, 翟明泉, 赵海刚, 李昌浩, 徐秀红. 不同采收成熟度烤后烟叶香气质量评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(3): 22-28. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.03.004
    引用本文: 王春凯, 王英俊, 矫海楠, 许家来, 任杰, 翟明泉, 赵海刚, 李昌浩, 徐秀红. 不同采收成熟度烤后烟叶香气质量评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(3): 22-28. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.03.004
    WANG Chunkai, WANG Yingjun, JIAO Hainan, XU Jialai, REN Jie, ZHAI Mingquan, ZHAO Haigang, LI Changhao, XU Xiuhong. Evaluation of Aroma Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco with Different Harvesting Maturity[J]. CHINESE TOBACCO SCIENCE, 2016, 37(3): 22-28. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.03.004
    Citation: WANG Chunkai, WANG Yingjun, JIAO Hainan, XU Jialai, REN Jie, ZHAI Mingquan, ZHAO Haigang, LI Changhao, XU Xiuhong. Evaluation of Aroma Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco with Different Harvesting Maturity[J]. CHINESE TOBACCO SCIENCE, 2016, 37(3): 22-28. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.03.004

    不同采收成熟度烤后烟叶香气质量评价

    Evaluation of Aroma Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco with Different Harvesting Maturity

    • 摘要: 以不同采收成熟度初烤烟叶为试验材料,采用感官评吸、电子鼻无损检测和气质联用法3种方式对烤后烟叶香气质量进行评价,分析不同处理烟叶的香气质量特征及主要致香成分的贡献,探索电子鼻评价烟叶香气质量的新方法。结果表明:7-8成黄采收的烤后烟叶评吸质量显著优于8-9成黄采收的烤后烟叶,但与6-7成黄采收处理无明显差异。气质联用法检测出的新植二烯含量与感官评吸结果吻合度较好,新植二烯可能对整体香气质量起主导作用。类胡萝卜素降解产物中的5,6-环氧紫罗兰酮、2-甲基-2-庚烯-6-酮和异佛尔酮,苯丙氨酸类降解产物中的苯甲醛、苯甲醇和4-乙烯基-2-甲氧基苯酚,美拉德反应产物中的5-甲基糠醛、吡嗪、3-甲基-2-环戊烯-1-酮,其他类致香物质中的γ-丁内酯等致香物质可能是影响不同成熟度烤后烟叶香气质量的关键成分。电子鼻可以初步判定不同处理烤烟的整体香气质量,对不同样品鉴别度较高。电子鼻检测可以作为一种有效评价烟叶整体香气质量的方式辅助烟叶感官评吸,提高香气质量评价的可靠性。

       

      Abstract: Aroma quality characteristics and contribution of main aroma components were analyzed using 3 methods inclusing sensory evaluation, electronic nose test and GC-MS to evaluate the aroma quality of flue-cured tobacco with different maturities. The results showed that flue-cured tobacco leaves with 70%-80% yellowing showed better smoking quality than that of 80%-90% yellowing but had no difference from leaves with 60%-70% yellowing. Neophytadiene content was determined by GC-MS and was in coincidence with the results of smoking evaluation. Neophytadiene probably plays an important role in promotion of the whole aroma quality. The carotenoid degradation products 5,6-epoxyionone, 2-methyl-2-heptene-6-ketone and isophorone, the phenylalanine degradation products benz aldehyde, benzyl alcohol and 4-ethenyl-2-methoxy phenol, and the Maillard reaction products 5-methyl furfural and pyrazine, 3-methyl-2-cyclopentene-1-ketone, as well as other aroma components including γ-butyrolactone, were probably the key aroma components that contributed to the whole aroma quality. Electronic nose, which can preliminarily identify the whole aroma quality of different samples at high level, suggesting that electronic nose test can be used as an effective and assistant way in evaluating whole aroma quality of flue-cure tobacco, which could improve the reliability of aroma-evaluating.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回