高级检索
    郑梅迎, 刘玉堂, 张忠锋, 程森, 蔡宪杰, 朱启法, 薛琳, 徐茜, 林伟, 张继光. 秸秆还田方式对植烟土壤团聚体特征及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(6): 11-18. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2019.06.002
    引用本文: 郑梅迎, 刘玉堂, 张忠锋, 程森, 蔡宪杰, 朱启法, 薛琳, 徐茜, 林伟, 张继光. 秸秆还田方式对植烟土壤团聚体特征及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(6): 11-18. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2019.06.002
    ZHENG Meiying, LIUYutang, ZHANG Zhongfeng, CHENG Sen, CAI Xianjie, ZHU Qifa, XUE Lin, XU Qian, LIN Wei, ZHANG Jiguang. Effect of Straw Returning on Soil Aggregate Characteristics and Tobacco Yield and Quality[J]. CHINESE TOBACCO SCIENCE, 2019, 40(6): 11-18. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2019.06.002
    Citation: ZHENG Meiying, LIUYutang, ZHANG Zhongfeng, CHENG Sen, CAI Xianjie, ZHU Qifa, XUE Lin, XU Qian, LIN Wei, ZHANG Jiguang. Effect of Straw Returning on Soil Aggregate Characteristics and Tobacco Yield and Quality[J]. CHINESE TOBACCO SCIENCE, 2019, 40(6): 11-18. DOI: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2019.06.002

    秸秆还田方式对植烟土壤团聚体特征及烤烟产质量的影响

    Effect of Straw Returning on Soil Aggregate Characteristics and Tobacco Yield and Quality

    • 摘要: 通过2年田间定位试验,研究烟稻轮作区不同还田方式对烟田土壤理化性质、团聚体特征及烤烟产质量的影响。试验设置4个处理:无秸秆(CK),秸秆覆盖还田(T1),秸秆粉碎还田(T2)及秸秆炭化还田(T3)。结果表明,不同秸秆还田方式均能改善土壤理化性质,与对照相比,粉碎还田和炭化还田显著提升土壤的pH、碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾含量(p≤0.05),其中以炭化还田的培肥效果最优;同时,3种还田方式均不同程度提高土壤的团粒结构及稳定性,其中以粉碎还田下土壤>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体总量、团聚体平均重量直径及几何平均直径等稳定性指标最高,而分维数最低,其次是秸秆炭化还田处理。从烤后烟叶的产质量来看,秸秆粉碎还田处理烟叶的经济效益、C3F等级烟叶的化学成分和感官评价质量均最优,其次是秸秆覆盖和炭化还田处理。综合来看,水稻秸秆粉碎还田是皖南烟稻轮作区较优的秸秆还田利用方式,其次是秸秆转化成生物炭还田及覆盖还田方式。

       

      Abstract: The effects of rice straw returning on soil physical and chemical properties, aggregate characteristics and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco in tobacco-rice rotation areas were studied through a two-year field positioning experiment. The experiment was set up with four treatments: no straw (CK), straw covered returning (T1), straw smashing (T2) and straw charring (T3). The results showed that all the rice straw-returning methods could improve soil physiochemical properties. Soil pH, soil alkali nitrogen, available phosphorus and potassium contents were significantly (p≤0.05) improved in the straw rushing and carbonizing treatments compared with those in the control treatment, and the effect of straw carbonization returning on soil fertilization was better. Meanwhile, all the three straw returning methods improved soil aggregate structure and stability in a certain degree, and the total amount of >0.25 mm soil water-stable aggregates, the values of average weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil aggregates were found to be the highest in the straw smashing treatment, which also had the lowest fractal dimension (D) values, followed by the straw charring treatment. From the perspective of the quantity and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves of C3F class, the economic benefits of flue-cured tobacco, the chemical composition and sensory quality of C3F grade tobacco leaves were optimal in the straw smashing returning treatment, followed by rice straw covered and charring treatments. Taken together, rice straw smashing returning is a better way of straw utilization in the tobacco-rice rotation area of southern Anhui Province, followed by improved straw conversion into biochar returning to the field and then the mulching returning.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回