高级检索
    郭金平, 邱志丹, 林桂华, 罗发健. 不同稻草还田方式对烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2007, 28(3): 24-25.
    引用本文: 郭金平, 邱志丹, 林桂华, 罗发健. 不同稻草还田方式对烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2007, 28(3): 24-25.
    Guo Jinping, Qiu Zhidan, Lin Guihua, Luo Fajian. Effects of Different Methods of Returning Straw to Soil on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. CHINESE TOBACCO SCIENCE, 2007, 28(3): 24-25.
    Citation: Guo Jinping, Qiu Zhidan, Lin Guihua, Luo Fajian. Effects of Different Methods of Returning Straw to Soil on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. CHINESE TOBACCO SCIENCE, 2007, 28(3): 24-25.

    不同稻草还田方式对烟叶产质量的影响

    Effects of Different Methods of Returning Straw to Soil on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco

    • 摘要: 通过田间试验研究了4种稻草还田方式对烟叶产质量的影响。结果表明,稻草还田配施白云石粉溶田方式对提高烟叶质量效果明显,还可以减轻病虫害的发生;稻草不经堆沤直接作为基肥施用不利于烟株生长发育及烟叶品质提高;稻草直接还田与稻草堆沤后作为基肥施用无明显差异。

       

      Abstract: The effects of four methods of returning straw to soil on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco were studied in rice field. The results showed that returning straw with dolomite powder to soil could improve flue-cured tobacco leaf quality remarkably, and reduce the occurrence of plant diseases and insects. Application of rice straw without composting as a basal fertilizer did not have beneficial affect on tobacco growth and leaf quality. When applying rice straw to rice field as a basal fertilizer, no significant difference in effect was observed between treatment with or without straw composting.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回